Monday 17 December 2012

Critical Review - WINOL Semester One


Critical Review – Sam Sheard
WINOL OVERVIEW
This semester can be considered a successful one for WINOL after a number of challenging projects were completed, alongside our weekly news and sports bulletins.
The aspect of WINOL which has seen the most progress over the course of this semester is undoubtedly the website, which has seen a complete overhaul in the space of the past twelve weeks. We have changed platforms from Joomla to Wordpress, which, despite somewhat restricting the website’s functionality, has created a more structured site. The front page has been made to resemble a modern broadsheet, reminiscent to some extent of the ‘i’ newspaper, with a strong focus on high quality pictures and our most recent stories. The latest bulletin no longer features permanently on the front page, it now only appears on the front page on the day of broadcast. A team has been assembled to continually update the website with news stories throughout the week, so that the website is as up to date as possible. This change in design and approach to our website has improved it dramatically, creating a more professional site and ensuring that the content of the site is always relevant, to increase circulation throughout the whole week. We have also experimented with hosting a twitter feed on the front page, to integrate the site with social media, keeping WINOL as modern as possible.
The Features department has also seen great improvements, with many high quality pieces being submitted throughout the term. This has contributed to a rise in the average visit time on the site, which is now roughly six minutes per user. As a wise man once said, they come for the news and they stay for the features. The quality of work by the features team this semester has ensured that our site has many interesting pieces to grab the attention of the reader, and keep them on the site.
Another of the great successes of this semester has been the special events and programs produced and coordinated by the team. This year’s BJTC awards were hosted at the university, and were filmed and photographed by the WINOL team. The footage featured in that week’s bulletin, as well as a highlights package on the website and a written article. The event was a huge success and the coverage was of a very high quality, giving the team a strong piece very early on in the semester. We also produced a multi camera live stream of the Hampshire Police and Crime Commissioner debate, which was hosted at the University, and organised, filmed and edited by members of the WINOL team. This event demonstrated the ambitions and capabilities of the team, and gave us another high profile piece with which to attract people to the site. Arguably the most ambitious special production of the year was America Decides, our US election program which aired live on the site. This piece brought together pre prepared packages assessing the two candidates, footage from the US embassy Election Night Party, live in studio discussion with a variety of guests, and a live transatlantic Skype conversation with University students in Illinois. The program was incredibly challenging, and we came across a number of problems throughout the preceding weeks, but these problems were overcome and we were able to produce a live, three hour program with a variety of good quality content.
Such ambitious projects undoubtedly benefited the team and the site, creating a high pressure environment in which to work and teaching us a lot about how to produce such programs. The content also was of great public interest, and was always audience focused. This, along with the high quality weekly bulletins and an impressive website, helped to improve our Alexa ranking greatly.
Our ranking is now significantly better than any other student journalism, with us well within the top 500,000 worldwide and narrowly outside the top 10,000 in the UK, beating our nearest student competitor, eastlondonlines, by 15,000 places in the UK at the time of writing.  We have also significantly outperformed the website of the Hampshire Chronicle in Alexa rankings. The Daily Echo, however, remains far ahead of us, both in the UK and worldwide. Our Alexa position, comparative to our direct competition, underscores the success that WINOL has seen this semester.
My personal role on WINOL this semester was as a sports reporter, specifically covering the home matches of Winchester City FC.
My first package was on the game between Winchester and Yate Town. The footage of the match was average; there were no glaring errors, but a lot of room for improvement. At times I zoomed in too close to the players and so found myself losing the ball in shots, as the play moved quickly. I also framed my post match interview with the manager poorly, centring him in the frame and speaking to him from too close to the camera, so at times he was speaking directly into the lens. Henry showed me how I could edit the footage of the interview on Final Cut to improve the positioning, but also taught me how to correctly frame and conduct interviews to get the best possible footage.
My next package was a profile of the University Rugby team, in which I filmed shots of the players training, held an interview with the captain and did two pieces to camera. As I was filming alone I had trouble filming the PTC’s as I could not be sure where I was positioned in shot, whether the gun mic I was using was visible, and whether the sound was being picked up. As a result I learnt that PTC’s are far more successful when there is someone behind the camera, to ensure everything is working correctly. Fortunately, I managed takes that I could use for the package, where I was framed correctly and the sound quality was good. I also failed to conduct the interview at the same time as I filmed the training footage, and so had to conduct the interview at the next training session. This made the package feel inconsistent as the footage of the training session was at night, while the interview was conducted in broad daylight. I had trouble with the brightness of the interview, and was shown how to edit colour and brightness on Final Cut, which improved the footage greatly, however it was still of a lower quality than I had hoped it would be. The sound quality on the interview also suffered, as the sound of wind was picked up by the microphone. I was advised to attempt to conduct future interviews somewhere more sheltered if the sound was being affected by wind. I
My next involvement was to film second camera for an AFC Totton match, where I was asked to zoom in on players and stay tight. This was challenging, but from the previous Winchester match I had attended I had learnt how to keep tight to players while not losing track of the ball. The footage I got was much improved from the Winchester game. I also framed Liam’s PTC’s for his package, which were also much improved on my previous efforts, obeying the rule of thirds.
I filmed two further Winchester matches during the semester. The camerawork was much improved, however in both I had some issues.
In Winchester’s match against Mangotsfield United I had accidentally left the camera on automatic settings, which caused the camera to fail to focus in time for one of the goals as I zoomed on the player. This was very disappointing, as other than focus I felt the shot was good and it also meant I had to leave out a goal from my package, which I felt made it incomplete. My footage of Winchester vs Didcot Town was very dark as it was an evening kick off, and the floodlights at Winchester’s ground are not strong enough. I managed to brighten the footage in final cut, however this negatively affected the quality, and it was not as sharp as I would have liked.
With each package of football highlights I struggled with my voiceovers. The quality of the track was consistently good, but I found myself describing the action too much, the words simply showing exactly what the footage did. Angus advised me that I need to be less descriptive, and could afford to speak less, with the commentary being sparser to allow the pictures to tell the story. For each game I submitted a written match report, which overall I was pleased with, however I lacked still photos to compliment the words.
As well as sport, I got involved in a variety of other areas and projects. On multiple occasions I helped in the gallery filming the bulletin on Wednesdays, predominantly working on the sound desk, but also behind the camera and on the autocue. I initially struggled with keeping the autocue moving at the right speed; however with Graham’s assistance I quickly mastered this. I felt comfortable behind the camera and on the sound desk, and was pleased with the job I did in those roles.
I was also involved in the US election program that we produced, both scripting a package and filming at the US Embassy Election Party. The lessons I had learnt from my sports coverage meant that my framing of interviews and pieces to camera was much improved, with the subject well focussed and framed, and the sound quality was strong in a difficult room. I was disappointed not to have managed to get a better shot of Russell Watson singing The Star Spangled Banner however, as I failed to get a spot on the raised podium in the room, and so the quality of the footage is weak. The package I scripted for the program eventually got divided into four separate packages, and as such my script was edited by others. I felt that my original script was fairly strong, however I was told that it was slightly too complicated, and that it would be better if I simplified the wording. This helped me with future script writing, as I developed a different style when writing for video, as opposed to purely written work.
Aside from this I also presented the Sportsweek show on Sound Radio, helped film a feature with Ben Hatton, and worked on production for the WINOL super bulletin.